<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (5) TMI 155 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72989</link>
    <description>Excise refund claims arising from a classification list filed under protest require statutory adjudication, and their return cannot be treated as a purely administrative act that defeats appellate recourse. Where the assessee has sought a written decision on classification, the absence of a formal appealable order does not by itself extinguish the remedy. An appellate authority must also comply with mandatory procedure under the appellate provision and, where hearing is requested, afford personal hearing before deciding the appeal. Failure to do so constitutes breach of natural justice and justifies setting aside the order and remand for fresh decision on the merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 13:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111268" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (5) TMI 155 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72989</link>
      <description>Excise refund claims arising from a classification list filed under protest require statutory adjudication, and their return cannot be treated as a purely administrative act that defeats appellate recourse. Where the assessee has sought a written decision on classification, the absence of a formal appealable order does not by itself extinguish the remedy. An appellate authority must also comply with mandatory procedure under the appellate provision and, where hearing is requested, afford personal hearing before deciding the appeal. Failure to do so constitutes breach of natural justice and justifies setting aside the order and remand for fresh decision on the merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72989</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>