<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (5) TMI 154 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72988</link>
    <description>Refund claims under the excess production incentive notification were held not to be barred by limitation merely because they were filed more than six months after duty payment. The Tribunal reasoned that admissible refund could not be quantified, and excess clearances could not be identified, until approval of the base clearance under the scheme. Limitation under Rule 11 was therefore computed from the date of approval of the base clearance, not from the date of duty payment. The Revenue&#039;s reliance on authorities governing ordinary refund claims was rejected, and the assessee&#039;s limitation plea was accepted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 13:19:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111267" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (5) TMI 154 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72988</link>
      <description>Refund claims under the excess production incentive notification were held not to be barred by limitation merely because they were filed more than six months after duty payment. The Tribunal reasoned that admissible refund could not be quantified, and excess clearances could not be identified, until approval of the base clearance under the scheme. Limitation under Rule 11 was therefore computed from the date of approval of the base clearance, not from the date of duty payment. The Revenue&#039;s reliance on authorities governing ordinary refund claims was rejected, and the assessee&#039;s limitation plea was accepted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72988</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>