<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (5) TMI 148 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72982</link>
    <description>Packing of loose tea can amount to manufacture for excise purposes, and package tea falls under Tariff Item 3(2). The manufacturer is the person who actually undertakes the packing work on a genuine principal-to-principal basis, unless the arrangement is proved to be a dummy or camouflage for the loose tea supplier. Where the packer has its own licensing arrangement, performs the work for consideration, and receives labour, input, profit, and transport charges under a real commercial contract, the packer is treated as the manufacturer. In that situation, concessional benefit under Notification No. 198/76-CE is available and differential duty is not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 13:04:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111261" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (5) TMI 148 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72982</link>
      <description>Packing of loose tea can amount to manufacture for excise purposes, and package tea falls under Tariff Item 3(2). The manufacturer is the person who actually undertakes the packing work on a genuine principal-to-principal basis, unless the arrangement is proved to be a dummy or camouflage for the loose tea supplier. Where the packer has its own licensing arrangement, performs the work for consideration, and receives labour, input, profit, and transport charges under a real commercial contract, the packer is treated as the manufacturer. In that situation, concessional benefit under Notification No. 198/76-CE is available and differential duty is not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72982</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>