<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (5) TMI 141 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72976</link>
    <description>Failure to maintain the repair register and keep statutory gold-account records written up to date attracted liability under Rule 12 of the Gold (Control) Rules, 1968 read with Sections 55 and 74 of the Gold (Control) Act, 1968. The Supreme Court observations on amended G.S. 11 and G.S. 12 forms applied only to form defects and did not excuse complete non-maintenance of accounts or omission to enter articles in the repair register. Because the alleged defects in updating the registers were factual and unrebutted, the reference application disclosed no question of law and the penalty based on the established contravention remained undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 12:53:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111255" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (5) TMI 141 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72976</link>
      <description>Failure to maintain the repair register and keep statutory gold-account records written up to date attracted liability under Rule 12 of the Gold (Control) Rules, 1968 read with Sections 55 and 74 of the Gold (Control) Act, 1968. The Supreme Court observations on amended G.S. 11 and G.S. 12 forms applied only to form defects and did not excuse complete non-maintenance of accounts or omission to enter articles in the repair register. Because the alleged defects in updating the registers were factual and unrebutted, the reference application disclosed no question of law and the penalty based on the established contravention remained undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72976</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>