<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (5) TMI 129 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72965</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the imported items were independent machines and not eligible for the concessional rate under Notification No. 40-Cus/78. The decision was based on the lack of essential documentary evidence and the differentiation of the case from previous Tribunal decisions. The Tribunal emphasized the strict interpretation of notification provisions and the necessity of comprehensive documentation to support claims for concessional duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 May 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 12:26:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111244" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (5) TMI 129 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72965</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the imported items were independent machines and not eligible for the concessional rate under Notification No. 40-Cus/78. The decision was based on the lack of essential documentary evidence and the differentiation of the case from previous Tribunal decisions. The Tribunal emphasized the strict interpretation of notification provisions and the necessity of comprehensive documentation to support claims for concessional duty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 May 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72965</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>