<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (4) TMI 204 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72957</link>
    <description>Hot rolled products of less than 3 mm thickness and 75 mm width were not classifiable as hoops merely because they matched dimensional limits. Classification depended on accepted trade meaning, commercial understanding, and the manufacturing process. The goods were produced in a bar mill, were not baling or packing materials, and lacked trade recognition as hoops. On that basis, they fell outside Tariff Item 26AA(ii) and were classified as bars under Tariff Item 26AA(ia).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 11:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111236" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (4) TMI 204 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72957</link>
      <description>Hot rolled products of less than 3 mm thickness and 75 mm width were not classifiable as hoops merely because they matched dimensional limits. Classification depended on accepted trade meaning, commercial understanding, and the manufacturing process. The goods were produced in a bar mill, were not baling or packing materials, and lacked trade recognition as hoops. On that basis, they fell outside Tariff Item 26AA(ii) and were classified as bars under Tariff Item 26AA(ia).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72957</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>