<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (1) TMI 268 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72941</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the preliminary objection, rejecting the appeals by M/s Kamani Engineering Corporation Ltd. and M/s Polychem Ltd. It was determined that M/s Polychem Ltd. lacked legal standing to challenge the confiscation order as they were not considered aggrieved persons with any legal right or interest in the goods. The order of confiscation and fine imposed were upheld, concluding that both appeals were unsuccessful.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 10:48:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111220" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (1) TMI 268 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72941</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the preliminary objection, rejecting the appeals by M/s Kamani Engineering Corporation Ltd. and M/s Polychem Ltd. It was determined that M/s Polychem Ltd. lacked legal standing to challenge the confiscation order as they were not considered aggrieved persons with any legal right or interest in the goods. The order of confiscation and fine imposed were upheld, concluding that both appeals were unsuccessful.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72941</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>