https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72888 The Tribunal upheld that Rosin should be included in the computation of "total oils" for duty rebates, rejecting the appellant's arguments. The appeal was dismissed due to lack of merit in the contentions presented, emphasizing that subsequent amendments and decisions in other cases could not support the appellant's position. The Tribunal clarified that the inclusive definition of "total oils" encompassed all saponifiable materials, including Rosin, despite specific mention in the Explanation. en-us Mon, 28 Feb 1983 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 May 2011 16:33:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72888 The Tribunal upheld that Rosin should be included in the computation of "total oils" for duty rebates, rejecting the appellant's arguments. The appeal was dismissed due to lack of merit in the contentions presented, emphasizing that subsequent amendments and decisions in other cases could not support the appellant's position. The Tribunal clarified that the inclusive definition of "total oils" encompassed all saponifiable materials, including Rosin, despite specific mention in the Explanation. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 28 Feb 1983 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72888