<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (2) TMI 160 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72886</link>
    <description>Rejection of a stevedoring charges claim for want of item-wise break-up details was found unjustified where the record showed only an ad hoc addition of Rs. 30 per MT and that rate lacked a satisfactory basis. Because the appellant could now furnish the supporting break-up and evidence, the matter required reconsideration on the merits. The impugned order was set aside and the case was remanded for fresh decision after production of the required material within a reasonable time.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 16:30:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111165" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (2) TMI 160 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72886</link>
      <description>Rejection of a stevedoring charges claim for want of item-wise break-up details was found unjustified where the record showed only an ad hoc addition of Rs. 30 per MT and that rate lacked a satisfactory basis. Because the appellant could now furnish the supporting break-up and evidence, the matter required reconsideration on the merits. The impugned order was set aside and the case was remanded for fresh decision after production of the required material within a reasonable time.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72886</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>