https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72882 Where a detention statute empowers the Central Government to revoke a detention order, the detenu has a corresponding effective right to place a representation before that authority. The State Government must therefore forward a representation addressed for Central Government consideration, and non-transmission frustrates the statutory safeguard. On the facts described, the detenu's representation was not forwarded, the Central Government did not consider it, and the detention was treated as illegal because the mandatory revocation mechanism was denied. en-us Fri, 15 Jul 1983 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 May 2011 16:11:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72882 Where a detention statute empowers the Central Government to revoke a detention order, the detenu has a corresponding effective right to place a representation before that authority. The State Government must therefore forward a representation addressed for Central Government consideration, and non-transmission frustrates the statutory safeguard. On the facts described, the detenu's representation was not forwarded, the Central Government did not consider it, and the detention was treated as illegal because the mandatory revocation mechanism was denied. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 15 Jul 1983 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72882