<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (3) TMI 223 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72864</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi determined that there was only one rate of basic customs duty based on the country of origin of imported timber, with a nil rate for specified countries. As a result, the auxiliary duty for timber imported from Burma was fixed at 30% ad valorem, contrary to the lower authorities&#039; imposition of 40%. The Tribunal set aside the previous orders and ruled in favor of the appellants, providing them with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 15:24:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111143" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (3) TMI 223 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72864</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi determined that there was only one rate of basic customs duty based on the country of origin of imported timber, with a nil rate for specified countries. As a result, the auxiliary duty for timber imported from Burma was fixed at 30% ad valorem, contrary to the lower authorities&#039; imposition of 40%. The Tribunal set aside the previous orders and ruled in favor of the appellants, providing them with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72864</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>