<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (3) TMI 212 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72853</link>
    <description>Fly ash generated during the burning of pulverised coal was treated as a by-product of manufacture, not as mere refuse. Because it was sold to consumer industries and had established commercial use, it was considered a marketable commodity known in trade. On that basis, the principle that waste or scrap incidentally arising in manufacture may still be excisable was applied, and fly ash was held liable to excise duty under Tariff Item 68.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 14:49:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111132" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (3) TMI 212 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72853</link>
      <description>Fly ash generated during the burning of pulverised coal was treated as a by-product of manufacture, not as mere refuse. Because it was sold to consumer industries and had established commercial use, it was considered a marketable commodity known in trade. On that basis, the principle that waste or scrap incidentally arising in manufacture may still be excisable was applied, and fly ash was held liable to excise duty under Tariff Item 68.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72853</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>