<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (2) TMI 251 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72838</link>
    <description>An express finding recorded at an earlier stage of the same eviction proceedings can bind the parties later in that litigation, even if the matter arose in an interlocutory context. Where the court found that the landlord had agreed to withdraw the eviction petition and had accepted rent from the tenant, that finding could not be ignored in the subsequent stage of the same case. Because the landlord did not challenge the finding at the proper stage, later courts were not entitled to disregard it. The eviction petition therefore could not be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2014 10:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111117" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (2) TMI 251 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72838</link>
      <description>An express finding recorded at an earlier stage of the same eviction proceedings can bind the parties later in that litigation, even if the matter arose in an interlocutory context. Where the court found that the landlord had agreed to withdraw the eviction petition and had accepted rent from the tenant, that finding could not be ignored in the subsequent stage of the same case. Because the landlord did not challenge the finding at the proper stage, later courts were not entitled to disregard it. The eviction petition therefore could not be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72838</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>