<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (2) TMI 234 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72823</link>
    <description>A declaration under the Voluntary Disclosure Scheme for primary gold was held to confer immunity where no proceeding under the Gold Control Act was pending when the declaration was made. Mere correspondence between departments did not amount to a pending proceeding, and the Scheme expressly covered primary gold. As the gold had not been seized or confiscated before the declaration, it was not liable to confiscation or penalty under the Gold Control Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 18:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111102" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (2) TMI 234 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72823</link>
      <description>A declaration under the Voluntary Disclosure Scheme for primary gold was held to confer immunity where no proceeding under the Gold Control Act was pending when the declaration was made. Mere correspondence between departments did not amount to a pending proceeding, and the Scheme expressly covered primary gold. As the gold had not been seized or confiscated before the declaration, it was not liable to confiscation or penalty under the Gold Control Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72823</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>