<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (1) TMI 250 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72796</link>
    <description>Refund claims cannot be used to bypass an approved price-list or classification/value approval that was not appealed, because the proper remedy is to challenge that approval directly; the refund route is confined to excess duty paid on the approved basis or to assessment error. On the trade discount issue, the declared price-lists and supporting records did not clearly and consistently establish a contemporaneous quantitative or other trade discount for the goods, and a later shift from selling expenses to discount required fresh material that was not available. The refund claims therefore failed on both grounds, and the dismissal was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 11:37:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111075" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (1) TMI 250 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72796</link>
      <description>Refund claims cannot be used to bypass an approved price-list or classification/value approval that was not appealed, because the proper remedy is to challenge that approval directly; the refund route is confined to excess duty paid on the approved basis or to assessment error. On the trade discount issue, the declared price-lists and supporting records did not clearly and consistently establish a contemporaneous quantitative or other trade discount for the goods, and a later shift from selling expenses to discount required fresh material that was not available. The refund claims therefore failed on both grounds, and the dismissal was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72796</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>