<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (12) TMI 214 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72785</link>
    <description>Redemption fine is not automatic merely because goods are liable to confiscation; the person burdened must be shown to have committed an act or omission attracting liability. Where the importer was not found guilty of any violation, imposing the fine offended natural justice and fair play. Once the goods had already been cleared by Customs and were no longer available for confiscation, redemption did not properly arise. The in rem character of proceedings against goods did not justify penal consequences against a person who had committed no offence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 10:50:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111064" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (12) TMI 214 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72785</link>
      <description>Redemption fine is not automatic merely because goods are liable to confiscation; the person burdened must be shown to have committed an act or omission attracting liability. Where the importer was not found guilty of any violation, imposing the fine offended natural justice and fair play. Once the goods had already been cleared by Customs and were no longer available for confiscation, redemption did not properly arise. The in rem character of proceedings against goods did not justify penal consequences against a person who had committed no offence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72785</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>