<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (12) TMI 207 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72778</link>
    <description>The appeal resulted in the confiscation order of two trucks with registration numbers NHT 552 and GTO 2917 being set aside. However, the confiscation order of the Matador with registration number GRD 9003 was confirmed based on the majority opinion of the technical members, despite dissent from the judicial member. The court found insufficient evidence linking the trucks to smuggling activities, leading to the decision to set aside their confiscation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 10:35:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111057" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (12) TMI 207 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72778</link>
      <description>The appeal resulted in the confiscation order of two trucks with registration numbers NHT 552 and GTO 2917 being set aside. However, the confiscation order of the Matador with registration number GRD 9003 was confirmed based on the majority opinion of the technical members, despite dissent from the judicial member. The court found insufficient evidence linking the trucks to smuggling activities, leading to the decision to set aside their confiscation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72778</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>