<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (12) TMI 202 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72773</link>
    <description>Imported natural, unprocessed manganese ore was held classifiable under Item 26 of the Indian Customs Tariff, 1934 for the period before 2-8-1976. The Tribunal followed the earlier Calcutta High Court ruling and its own Five Member Bench decision, both of which had classified the same commodity under Item 26 for the relevant period. The competing claim for Item 28 was rejected, and the assessees were granted the classification sought with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 18:52:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111052" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (12) TMI 202 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72773</link>
      <description>Imported natural, unprocessed manganese ore was held classifiable under Item 26 of the Indian Customs Tariff, 1934 for the period before 2-8-1976. The Tribunal followed the earlier Calcutta High Court ruling and its own Five Member Bench decision, both of which had classified the same commodity under Item 26 for the relevant period. The competing claim for Item 28 was rejected, and the assessees were granted the classification sought with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72773</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>