<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (11) TMI 237 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72770</link>
    <description>A manufacturer relieved of duty under a conditional exemption notification is treated as having availed that notification, even if the procedure operates through Chapter X conditions, so the exclusion in para 2 of Notification No. 71/78 applied. A later notification referring to Notification No. 101/71 was construed as incorporating that notification as it stood when the later instrument was issued, not only its original unamended form. The exclusion in para 2 could not be narrowed by importing an unstated condition that only manufacturers who also obtained raw materials duty-free were disqualified, and equity could not override the plain terms of a fiscal exemption. The exemption claim and consequential refund claims therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 18:44:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111049" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (11) TMI 237 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72770</link>
      <description>A manufacturer relieved of duty under a conditional exemption notification is treated as having availed that notification, even if the procedure operates through Chapter X conditions, so the exclusion in para 2 of Notification No. 71/78 applied. A later notification referring to Notification No. 101/71 was construed as incorporating that notification as it stood when the later instrument was issued, not only its original unamended form. The exclusion in para 2 could not be narrowed by importing an unstated condition that only manufacturers who also obtained raw materials duty-free were disqualified, and equity could not override the plain terms of a fiscal exemption. The exemption claim and consequential refund claims therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72770</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>