<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (10) TMI 228 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72755</link>
    <description>Once an adjudication order is set aside in appeal and the matter is remanded for de novo consideration, the earlier order is treated as having been wiped out in law and cannot be simply confirmed again by the original authority. Fresh adjudication must be undertaken in accordance with law after giving the assessee an opportunity of hearing. On that basis, the impugned de novo order was found legally defective and was set aside, with the matter remanded for fresh decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 17:57:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111034" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (10) TMI 228 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72755</link>
      <description>Once an adjudication order is set aside in appeal and the matter is remanded for de novo consideration, the earlier order is treated as having been wiped out in law and cannot be simply confirmed again by the original authority. Fresh adjudication must be undertaken in accordance with law after giving the assessee an opportunity of hearing. On that basis, the impugned de novo order was found legally defective and was set aside, with the matter remanded for fresh decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72755</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>