<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (2) TMI 185 - CEGAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72716</link>
    <description>Where goods are manufactured for a buyer and sold under the buyer&#039;s trade name, assessable value is to be taken from the manufacturer&#039;s factory-gate wholesale price if that price is ascertainable, rather than the buyer&#039;s later resale price. The arrangement was treated as a sale of future goods between independent parties, not as a hiring of the manufacturer as the buyer&#039;s agent or labour. Delivery and title-passing terms at the buyer&#039;s godown did not displace the factory-gate valuation basis, and manufacture to specifications, approval procedures, or branding did not by themselves negate an arm&#039;s length wholesale sale.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 15:23:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=110995" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (2) TMI 185 - CEGAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72716</link>
      <description>Where goods are manufactured for a buyer and sold under the buyer&#039;s trade name, assessable value is to be taken from the manufacturer&#039;s factory-gate wholesale price if that price is ascertainable, rather than the buyer&#039;s later resale price. The arrangement was treated as a sale of future goods between independent parties, not as a hiring of the manufacturer as the buyer&#039;s agent or labour. Delivery and title-passing terms at the buyer&#039;s godown did not displace the factory-gate valuation basis, and manufacture to specifications, approval procedures, or branding did not by themselves negate an arm&#039;s length wholesale sale.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72716</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>