<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (12) TMI 175 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72689</link>
    <description>Grinding soapstone lumps into powder of required fineness was treated as manufacture because the process produced a product with a different name, character and use, including distinct industrial utility as a filler or extender. The exemption under Notification No. 23/55-C.E. was also available because soapstone and talc were treated as the same mineral, and the notification covered minerals known to be used as extenders, suspending agents, fillers or diluents without requiring proof of actual use in each case. On that reasoning, the demand could not be sustained, although the manufactured product remained within the exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 13:14:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=110968" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (12) TMI 175 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72689</link>
      <description>Grinding soapstone lumps into powder of required fineness was treated as manufacture because the process produced a product with a different name, character and use, including distinct industrial utility as a filler or extender. The exemption under Notification No. 23/55-C.E. was also available because soapstone and talc were treated as the same mineral, and the notification covered minerals known to be used as extenders, suspending agents, fillers or diluents without requiring proof of actual use in each case. On that reasoning, the demand could not be sustained, although the manufactured product remained within the exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72689</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>