https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72685 The Supreme Court construed Article 323A and the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 to mean that the Central Administrative Tribunal functions as a substitute for the High Court in service matters. It may decide disputes concerning service conditions and examine the constitutional validity of a rule framed under Article 309 on grounds of Articles 14 and 16(1). The exclusion of High Court jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 does not extinguish judicial review, because the Supreme Court's jurisdiction under Articles 32 and 136 remains preserved. The challenge to the Tribunal's power to strike down the impugned notification therefore failed, and its jurisdiction was affirmed. en-us Fri, 19 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Oct 2014 13:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72685 The Supreme Court construed Article 323A and the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 to mean that the Central Administrative Tribunal functions as a substitute for the High Court in service matters. It may decide disputes concerning service conditions and examine the constitutional validity of a rule framed under Article 309 on grounds of Articles 14 and 16(1). The exclusion of High Court jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 does not extinguish judicial review, because the Supreme Court's jurisdiction under Articles 32 and 136 remains preserved. The challenge to the Tribunal's power to strike down the impugned notification therefore failed, and its jurisdiction was affirmed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 19 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72685