https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72680 The request for a Special Bench of 5 Members due to conflicting decisions was considered, leading to a detailed examination of the conflicting decisions by different Benches of the Tribunal. The President's authority to set aside a judicial order was analyzed, focusing on whether the President could administratively override a judicial decision. The conflict in decisions regarding excise duty assessment was scrutinized, emphasizing the need for resolution. The acceptance of proposals and subsequent actions by the parties influenced the decision, leading to the rejection of the plea for a Special Bench and scheduling the appeal for a hearing on merits. en-us Fri, 12 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 May 2011 12:37:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72680 The request for a Special Bench of 5 Members due to conflicting decisions was considered, leading to a detailed examination of the conflicting decisions by different Benches of the Tribunal. The President's authority to set aside a judicial order was analyzed, focusing on whether the President could administratively override a judicial decision. The conflict in decisions regarding excise duty assessment was scrutinized, emphasizing the need for resolution. The acceptance of proposals and subsequent actions by the parties influenced the decision, leading to the rejection of the plea for a Special Bench and scheduling the appeal for a hearing on merits. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 12 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72680