https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72644 The Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Review by the Collector of Customs and Central Excise, Jaipur, and the Corrigendum issued by the Adjudicating Authority. The original Adjudication Order was restored, with the case not being remitted for Adjudication de novo due to the age of the case and the trivial value of the Watch Movements. The Tribunal considered the undue hardship and lack of objection from the Department in reaching this decision. en-us Mon, 30 Jun 1986 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 May 2011 18:53:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72644 The Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Review by the Collector of Customs and Central Excise, Jaipur, and the Corrigendum issued by the Adjudicating Authority. The original Adjudication Order was restored, with the case not being remitted for Adjudication de novo due to the age of the case and the trivial value of the Watch Movements. The Tribunal considered the undue hardship and lack of objection from the Department in reaching this decision. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 30 Jun 1986 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72644