https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72636 Judicial review was treated as part of the basic structure, so Parliament could replace High Court service jurisdiction only with an alternative tribunal that is effective, independent and efficacious. The article explains that exclusion of High Court jurisdiction may stand if the Tribunal functions as a real substitute for constitutional review, but its composition and appointment process must avoid executive dominance. It also notes that judicially trained leadership, meaningful consultation and a proper selection mechanism are necessary to preserve competence and public confidence. The discussed directions therefore upheld the tribunal scheme in principle while requiring stricter safeguards for appointments and qualifications. en-us Tue, 09 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 Jul 2014 15:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72636 Judicial review was treated as part of the basic structure, so Parliament could replace High Court service jurisdiction only with an alternative tribunal that is effective, independent and efficacious. The article explains that exclusion of High Court jurisdiction may stand if the Tribunal functions as a real substitute for constitutional review, but its composition and appointment process must avoid executive dominance. It also notes that judicially trained leadership, meaningful consultation and a proper selection mechanism are necessary to preserve competence and public confidence. The discussed directions therefore upheld the tribunal scheme in principle while requiring stricter safeguards for appointments and qualifications. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 09 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72636