<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (11) TMI 197 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72629</link>
    <description>Rule 233A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 required notice and a reasonable opportunity of representation and personal hearing before confiscation or penalty, unless waived. The adjudication was ex parte and no personal hearing was granted, so the mandatory procedural safeguard and principles of natural justice were breached. The confiscation, duty demand and penalty order was therefore unsustainable and was set aside, with the matter remanded for fresh adjudication after granting a reasonable opportunity of hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 18:08:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=110908" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (11) TMI 197 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72629</link>
      <description>Rule 233A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 required notice and a reasonable opportunity of representation and personal hearing before confiscation or penalty, unless waived. The adjudication was ex parte and no personal hearing was granted, so the mandatory procedural safeguard and principles of natural justice were breached. The confiscation, duty demand and penalty order was therefore unsustainable and was set aside, with the matter remanded for fresh adjudication after granting a reasonable opportunity of hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72629</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>