<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (11) TMI 186 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72618</link>
    <description>Exemption under a conditional notification was available only if the manufacturer declared the aluminium as electrical conductor grade and conclusively proved that the goods were required to be supplied and distributed under the Aluminium (Control) Order, 1970. The documentary record was found incomplete: it mainly showed allocation of raw material and did not establish compliance for the full quantity covered by the returns. On that basis, the concessional duty claim could not be sustained on the material then available, and the exemption order was set aside with the matter remitted for fresh decision after further evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 17:48:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=110897" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (11) TMI 186 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72618</link>
      <description>Exemption under a conditional notification was available only if the manufacturer declared the aluminium as electrical conductor grade and conclusively proved that the goods were required to be supplied and distributed under the Aluminium (Control) Order, 1970. The documentary record was found incomplete: it mainly showed allocation of raw material and did not establish compliance for the full quantity covered by the returns. On that basis, the concessional duty claim could not be sustained on the material then available, and the exemption order was set aside with the matter remitted for fresh decision after further evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72618</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>