<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (11) TMI 179 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72611</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the lower authorities&#039; decision to assess the appellants&#039; imports based on the higher price paid by other buyers, which included an 18% buying commission. The tribunal found that the invoice price paid by the appellants was not the sole consideration for the sale, as expenses on market promotion and the buying commission were integral to the assessable value of the goods. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 17:26:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=110890" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (11) TMI 179 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72611</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the lower authorities&#039; decision to assess the appellants&#039; imports based on the higher price paid by other buyers, which included an 18% buying commission. The tribunal found that the invoice price paid by the appellants was not the sole consideration for the sale, as expenses on market promotion and the buying commission were integral to the assessable value of the goods. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72611</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>