<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (10) TMI 161 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72606</link>
    <description>Excise refund claims arising from provisional assessment under Rule 9B run from the date the assessment is finalised, not from earlier stock-transfer clearances; the corresponding refund limitation under Rule 11 therefore begins on finalisation, including the date of the relevant DD-2 demand. Where wholesale sales were available at the factory gate, Section 4 required valuation on the factory-gate wholesale cash price at the time and place of removal, not on the later ex-depot sale price. Refund claims for periods before 19-8-1974 were time-barred because the assessments were not provisional for that period, and the challenge to differential duty paid against DD-2 demands also failed as time-barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 17:10:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=110885" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (10) TMI 161 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72606</link>
      <description>Excise refund claims arising from provisional assessment under Rule 9B run from the date the assessment is finalised, not from earlier stock-transfer clearances; the corresponding refund limitation under Rule 11 therefore begins on finalisation, including the date of the relevant DD-2 demand. Where wholesale sales were available at the factory gate, Section 4 required valuation on the factory-gate wholesale cash price at the time and place of removal, not on the later ex-depot sale price. Refund claims for periods before 19-8-1974 were time-barred because the assessments were not provisional for that period, and the challenge to differential duty paid against DD-2 demands also failed as time-barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72606</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>