<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (10) TMI 154 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72599</link>
    <description>In tariff classification, a single dry cell may be treated as a dry battery where common parlance and accepted technical usage recognise it as an electrical energy-producing device. The analysis notes that although a battery can, in strict technical sense, mean an assembly of cells, market understanding and ordinary speech also support classifying a single cell as a battery. The benefit-of-doubt principle was considered inapplicable because the evidence did not show real ambiguity. On that approach, a single dry cell falls under tariff item 31(1) as a dry battery, and the assessee&#039;s claim fails.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 16:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=110878" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (10) TMI 154 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72599</link>
      <description>In tariff classification, a single dry cell may be treated as a dry battery where common parlance and accepted technical usage recognise it as an electrical energy-producing device. The analysis notes that although a battery can, in strict technical sense, mean an assembly of cells, market understanding and ordinary speech also support classifying a single cell as a battery. The benefit-of-doubt principle was considered inapplicable because the evidence did not show real ambiguity. On that approach, a single dry cell falls under tariff item 31(1) as a dry battery, and the assessee&#039;s claim fails.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72599</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>