<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (9) TMI 255 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72582</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Collector of Customs lacked competence to revise the order under Section 130(2) of the Customs Act after the two-year statutory period had expired. The provision was deemed mandatory, imposing a limitation period for finalizing proceedings. As the order-in-review was issued post the two-year limit, it was deemed unsustainable, leading to the appeal being allowed solely on this ground, resulting in the order dated 8-8-1977 being set aside without delving into the case&#039;s substantive merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 15:45:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=110861" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (9) TMI 255 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72582</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Collector of Customs lacked competence to revise the order under Section 130(2) of the Customs Act after the two-year statutory period had expired. The provision was deemed mandatory, imposing a limitation period for finalizing proceedings. As the order-in-review was issued post the two-year limit, it was deemed unsustainable, leading to the appeal being allowed solely on this ground, resulting in the order dated 8-8-1977 being set aside without delving into the case&#039;s substantive merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72582</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>