<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (7) TMI 273 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72540</link>
    <description>Concessional project-import treatment depends on truthful disclosure and compliance with the registration, licence, and end-use conditions. Where the importer stated that machinery was for expansion of its existing plant, although the transfer agreement had already been executed and the goods were not installed in its premises, the declaration was materially incorrect and reassessment on merits was justified. Breach of the licence condition against transfer or diversion attracted confiscation, and penalty could follow even if the goods were no longer physically available. Short levy caused by misstatement and non-disclosure could also be recovered under the extended limitation provision, as the customs authorities were entitled to examine whether the import conditions were fulfilled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 13:01:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=110819" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (7) TMI 273 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72540</link>
      <description>Concessional project-import treatment depends on truthful disclosure and compliance with the registration, licence, and end-use conditions. Where the importer stated that machinery was for expansion of its existing plant, although the transfer agreement had already been executed and the goods were not installed in its premises, the declaration was materially incorrect and reassessment on merits was justified. Breach of the licence condition against transfer or diversion attracted confiscation, and penalty could follow even if the goods were no longer physically available. Short levy caused by misstatement and non-disclosure could also be recovered under the extended limitation provision, as the customs authorities were entitled to examine whether the import conditions were fulfilled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72540</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>