<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (6) TMI 174 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72539</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Corrigendum issued to modify the Adjudication Order was without authority. It set aside both the Order-in-Review and the Corrigendum, reinstating the original Adjudication Order. The Tribunal declined to remit the case for re-adjudication due to the appellant&#039;s undue hardship and lack of objection from the Department.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 12:59:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=110818" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (6) TMI 174 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72539</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Corrigendum issued to modify the Adjudication Order was without authority. It set aside both the Order-in-Review and the Corrigendum, reinstating the original Adjudication Order. The Tribunal declined to remit the case for re-adjudication due to the appellant&#039;s undue hardship and lack of objection from the Department.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72539</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>