<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (6) TMI 173 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72538</link>
    <description>For a special excise levy conditioned on employment not exceeding a prescribed number of workers, workers engaged in normal packing incidental to completion and marketability of the goods are counted as part of the manufacturing process. On the facts noted, records, workers&#039; statements, admissions, common premises, and common supervision showed that the units together employed more than five workers, attracting disqualification from the special procedure. The finding of contravention sustained the penalty, while the differential duty required fresh verification and recomputation on the basis of the production and clearance figures produced by the assessees.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 12:55:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=110817" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (6) TMI 173 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72538</link>
      <description>For a special excise levy conditioned on employment not exceeding a prescribed number of workers, workers engaged in normal packing incidental to completion and marketability of the goods are counted as part of the manufacturing process. On the facts noted, records, workers&#039; statements, admissions, common premises, and common supervision showed that the units together employed more than five workers, attracting disqualification from the special procedure. The finding of contravention sustained the penalty, while the differential duty required fresh verification and recomputation on the basis of the production and clearance figures produced by the assessees.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72538</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>