https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72524 Questions of law concerning liability to excise duty, the effect of permission under Rule 56-C, claimed exemption under Notification No. 105/80, and penalty were treated as arising from the Tribunal's order. The Tribunal held that the later questions were consequential to the core controversy and found the formulated issues fit for reference under the statutory reference provision. The questions of law were therefore referred to the High Court for decision, leaving the substantive excise liability issues to be determined there. en-us Tue, 18 Nov 1986 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 May 2011 11:54:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72524 Questions of law concerning liability to excise duty, the effect of permission under Rule 56-C, claimed exemption under Notification No. 105/80, and penalty were treated as arising from the Tribunal's order. The Tribunal held that the later questions were consequential to the core controversy and found the formulated issues fit for reference under the statutory reference provision. The questions of law were therefore referred to the High Court for decision, leaving the substantive excise liability issues to be determined there. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 18 Nov 1986 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72524