<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (5) TMI 164 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72502</link>
    <description>A restriction on export under section 3 of the Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947 must identify the goods by specified description; a bare reference to destination is not enough. The statute permits prohibition, restriction or control of imports and exports, but the regulatory scheme and related forms distinguish between the place of destination and the description of goods. A notification that barred export of all goods to a named destination without describing the goods was therefore unsustainable. The challenge to the show-cause notice succeeded, while the question whether the Chief Controller had authority to issue or authenticate the notification was not finally decided.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 10:29:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=110781" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (5) TMI 164 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72502</link>
      <description>A restriction on export under section 3 of the Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947 must identify the goods by specified description; a bare reference to destination is not enough. The statute permits prohibition, restriction or control of imports and exports, but the regulatory scheme and related forms distinguish between the place of destination and the description of goods. A notification that barred export of all goods to a named destination without describing the goods was therefore unsustainable. The challenge to the show-cause notice succeeded, while the question whether the Chief Controller had authority to issue or authenticate the notification was not finally decided.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72502</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>