https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72501 An application to vacate an earlier stay order was held not maintainable because it was filed by an Assistant Collector without any shown legal authority to seek that relief on behalf of the respondent Collector of Central Excise. The Tribunal treated the request as a substantive attempt to review its own stay order and held that it had no power to sit in appeal over or recall its order on merits absent statutory authority. Reliance on a Supreme Court decision was also unavailing because that decision predated the stay order. The application was rejected. en-us Tue, 29 Apr 1986 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 May 2011 10:27:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72501 An application to vacate an earlier stay order was held not maintainable because it was filed by an Assistant Collector without any shown legal authority to seek that relief on behalf of the respondent Collector of Central Excise. The Tribunal treated the request as a substantive attempt to review its own stay order and held that it had no power to sit in appeal over or recall its order on merits absent statutory authority. Reliance on a Supreme Court decision was also unavailing because that decision predated the stay order. The application was rejected. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 29 Apr 1986 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72501