https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72499 The Tribunal held that the order of dismissal by the Board Member (Judicial) based on limitation was justified, but the appeal should have been kept pending until the disposal of another appeal. Regarding the appeal treated as a revision, the Tribunal found that the Board's rejection without hearing the merits was unjustified. The Tribunal ruled that the revision under Section 35A is maintainable, and the order by the Member (Central Excise) was unsustainable. The appellants were directed to address arguments on the merits of the revision in Appeal No. 1091 of 1982. en-us Mon, 28 Apr 1986 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 19 May 2011 18:54:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72499 The Tribunal held that the order of dismissal by the Board Member (Judicial) based on limitation was justified, but the appeal should have been kept pending until the disposal of another appeal. Regarding the appeal treated as a revision, the Tribunal found that the Board's rejection without hearing the merits was unjustified. The Tribunal ruled that the revision under Section 35A is maintainable, and the order by the Member (Central Excise) was unsustainable. The appellants were directed to address arguments on the merits of the revision in Appeal No. 1091 of 1982. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 28 Apr 1986 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72499