<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (2) TMI 218 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72469</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed the applicability of Section 123 of the Customs Act to the seizure of diamonds. It held that the appellant failed to discharge the burden of proof, leading to the seizure and confiscation of the diamonds being upheld. The penalty imposed on the appellant was deemed justified. The discharge by the Criminal Court did not impact the adjudication proceedings, as different rules of evidence apply. Ultimately, the appeal was rejected based on the majority opinion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 17:19:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=110748" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (2) TMI 218 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72469</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed the applicability of Section 123 of the Customs Act to the seizure of diamonds. It held that the appellant failed to discharge the burden of proof, leading to the seizure and confiscation of the diamonds being upheld. The penalty imposed on the appellant was deemed justified. The discharge by the Criminal Court did not impact the adjudication proceedings, as different rules of evidence apply. Ultimately, the appeal was rejected based on the majority opinion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72469</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>