<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (12) TMI 222 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72453</link>
    <description>Rule 56A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was construed in its manufacturing context, and &quot;material&quot; was understood as referring to raw material received for use in manufacture rather than to all goods used in a factory. The rule&#039;s provisions on provisional credit, waste in manufacture, stock on discontinuance of credit, transfer of work-in-process, and removal of partially processed material supported that reading. The interpretive principle of noscitur a sociis reinforced the narrower meaning because &quot;material&quot; appeared alongside &quot;components&quot;. The surviving question of law was therefore considered fit for reference to the High Court, while the other proposed questions were treated as not surviving.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Dec 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 16:33:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=110732" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (12) TMI 222 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72453</link>
      <description>Rule 56A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was construed in its manufacturing context, and &quot;material&quot; was understood as referring to raw material received for use in manufacture rather than to all goods used in a factory. The rule&#039;s provisions on provisional credit, waste in manufacture, stock on discontinuance of credit, transfer of work-in-process, and removal of partially processed material supported that reading. The interpretive principle of noscitur a sociis reinforced the narrower meaning because &quot;material&quot; appeared alongside &quot;components&quot;. The surviving question of law was therefore considered fit for reference to the High Court, while the other proposed questions were treated as not surviving.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Dec 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>