<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (12) TMI 217 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72448</link>
    <description>Cancellation of a gold dealer&#039;s licence was held unsustainable where the alleged false statement or suppression about retirement from a partnership was not established on the record. The authority had accepted the retirement process and possessed the relevant documents before issuing the licence, so the renewal application could not be treated as deliberately false. Cancellation also failed procedurally because the show cause notice proposed only suspension, not cancellation, leaving the licence holder without fair notice of the real adverse action and contrary to the statutory requirement of reasonable opportunity and natural justice. The licence was directed to continue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=110727" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (12) TMI 217 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72448</link>
      <description>Cancellation of a gold dealer&#039;s licence was held unsustainable where the alleged false statement or suppression about retirement from a partnership was not established on the record. The authority had accepted the retirement process and possessed the relevant documents before issuing the licence, so the renewal application could not be treated as deliberately false. Cancellation also failed procedurally because the show cause notice proposed only suspension, not cancellation, leaving the licence holder without fair notice of the real adverse action and contrary to the statutory requirement of reasonable opportunity and natural justice. The licence was directed to continue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72448</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>