<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (9) TMI 207 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72430</link>
    <description>Electric motors manufactured for use as component parts in electric fans were held to fall within the tariff entry covering electric motors of all kinds, so their output had to be counted for the ceiling under Notification No. 68/60. The appellants did not establish that the starters and rotors used in fan manufacture were outside that description. The earlier exemption for captively used components in fan manufacture under Notification No. 28/69 was not in dispute; the operative question was only whether such motors were includible in the unit&#039;s total output for the clearance ceiling. On that basis, the motors were correctly taken into account and the exemption was unavailable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 14:40:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=110709" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (9) TMI 207 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72430</link>
      <description>Electric motors manufactured for use as component parts in electric fans were held to fall within the tariff entry covering electric motors of all kinds, so their output had to be counted for the ceiling under Notification No. 68/60. The appellants did not establish that the starters and rotors used in fan manufacture were outside that description. The earlier exemption for captively used components in fan manufacture under Notification No. 28/69 was not in dispute; the operative question was only whether such motors were includible in the unit&#039;s total output for the clearance ceiling. On that basis, the motors were correctly taken into account and the exemption was unavailable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72430</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>