<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (9) TMI 194 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72417</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the company in a dispute over the assessment of steel ingots for claimed exemptions under various notifications. The Collector alleged suppression of material information by the company, imposing penalties and demanding duty. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of ferro alloys in steel making, rejecting the Collector&#039;s interpretation of exemption notifications. It highlighted the integral role of ferro-silicon and ferro-manganese in steel production, overturning the Collector&#039;s decision and emphasizing the misunderstanding of technology by the department. The judgment underscored the importance of ferro alloys in the steel industry and clarified misconceptions about steel-making processes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 13:13:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=110696" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (9) TMI 194 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72417</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the company in a dispute over the assessment of steel ingots for claimed exemptions under various notifications. The Collector alleged suppression of material information by the company, imposing penalties and demanding duty. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of ferro alloys in steel making, rejecting the Collector&#039;s interpretation of exemption notifications. It highlighted the integral role of ferro-silicon and ferro-manganese in steel production, overturning the Collector&#039;s decision and emphasizing the misunderstanding of technology by the department. The judgment underscored the importance of ferro alloys in the steel industry and clarified misconceptions about steel-making processes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72417</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>