<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (8) TMI 198 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72411</link>
    <description>Rule 56-B of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 permits removal of excisable goods only when they are semi-finished and the subsequent process completes that product, or when finished goods are removed for testing. Partially oriented polyester filament yarn was held to be an identifiable, marketable excisable commodity, not semi-finished goods, because the proposed drawing and texturising would convert it into a different excisable product, textured yarn. Its further use in weaving or knitting, end use, and captive consumption did not alter its character for Rule 56-B. The provision therefore did not authorise removal of POY for conversion into another excisable commodity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 12:56:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=110690" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (8) TMI 198 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72411</link>
      <description>Rule 56-B of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 permits removal of excisable goods only when they are semi-finished and the subsequent process completes that product, or when finished goods are removed for testing. Partially oriented polyester filament yarn was held to be an identifiable, marketable excisable commodity, not semi-finished goods, because the proposed drawing and texturising would convert it into a different excisable product, textured yarn. Its further use in weaving or knitting, end use, and captive consumption did not alter its character for Rule 56-B. The provision therefore did not authorise removal of POY for conversion into another excisable commodity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72411</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>