<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (7) TMI 261 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72399</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the respondents failed to meet the mandatory conditions for &#039;Project Import&#039; benefits under T.I. 84.66 as the import contract was not registered before clearance of the goods. Consequently, the refund claim for duty paid on 12 Air Jet Looms was deemed invalid. The Tribunal set aside the Collector (Appeals) order and upheld the Assistant Collector&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 12:22:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=110678" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (7) TMI 261 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72399</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the respondents failed to meet the mandatory conditions for &#039;Project Import&#039; benefits under T.I. 84.66 as the import contract was not registered before clearance of the goods. Consequently, the refund claim for duty paid on 12 Air Jet Looms was deemed invalid. The Tribunal set aside the Collector (Appeals) order and upheld the Assistant Collector&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72399</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>