<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (7) TMI 247 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72385</link>
    <description>Imported refrigeration equipment intended for use in an anodizing plant was treated as a complete refrigerating appliance on the basis of the manufacturer&#039;s catalogue and supplier&#039;s letter. Item 29A of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1975 was applied broadly to cover refrigerating and air-conditioning appliances and machinery, including their parts and variants. On that construction, the unit fell within Item 29A(i) and was liable to countervailing duty, so the levy was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 11:05:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=110664" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (7) TMI 247 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72385</link>
      <description>Imported refrigeration equipment intended for use in an anodizing plant was treated as a complete refrigerating appliance on the basis of the manufacturer&#039;s catalogue and supplier&#039;s letter. Item 29A of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1975 was applied broadly to cover refrigerating and air-conditioning appliances and machinery, including their parts and variants. On that construction, the unit fell within Item 29A(i) and was liable to countervailing duty, so the levy was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72385</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>