<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (6) TMI 132 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72377</link>
    <description>Diakanol AMH, an aqueous solution of polyacrylamide synthetic resin derived from acrylamide, was held to fall within Tariff Item 15A(i) because that entry covered polymerisation and co-polymerisation products including polyacrylic derivatives. Classification was determined by the product&#039;s scientific and technical character, not by claimed end-use or trade advice. The Chemical Examiner&#039;s reference to use did not displace the composition-based classification, and a product squarely covered by a specific tariff entry cannot be moved to the residuary item merely for convenience. It was therefore classifiable under Tariff Item 15A(i) and not under Tariff Item 68.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 18:45:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=110656" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (6) TMI 132 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72377</link>
      <description>Diakanol AMH, an aqueous solution of polyacrylamide synthetic resin derived from acrylamide, was held to fall within Tariff Item 15A(i) because that entry covered polymerisation and co-polymerisation products including polyacrylic derivatives. Classification was determined by the product&#039;s scientific and technical character, not by claimed end-use or trade advice. The Chemical Examiner&#039;s reference to use did not displace the composition-based classification, and a product squarely covered by a specific tariff entry cannot be moved to the residuary item merely for convenience. It was therefore classifiable under Tariff Item 15A(i) and not under Tariff Item 68.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72377</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>