<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (3) TMI 198 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72326</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld that submitting a refund claim to the Superintendent, even if addressed to the Assistant Collector, met the statutory time limit requirement under Section 11B of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. The judgment emphasized procedural compliance and the authority of the Central Government to relax provisions in refund claims. The appeal was dismissed, directing the Assistant Collector to reconsider the matter in accordance with the Tribunal&#039;s decision and past practices. The ruling provides clarity on refund claim submissions and highlights the importance of adherence to established procedures within the Collectorate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 15:48:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=110605" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (3) TMI 198 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72326</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld that submitting a refund claim to the Superintendent, even if addressed to the Assistant Collector, met the statutory time limit requirement under Section 11B of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. The judgment emphasized procedural compliance and the authority of the Central Government to relax provisions in refund claims. The appeal was dismissed, directing the Assistant Collector to reconsider the matter in accordance with the Tribunal&#039;s decision and past practices. The ruling provides clarity on refund claim submissions and highlights the importance of adherence to established procedures within the Collectorate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72326</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>