https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72323 The Tribunal rejected the applications for condonation of delay, holding that the date of service on the Assistant Collector, Coordination Unit, was the effective date of service on the Collector of Customs, Bombay. The appellant failed to prove sufficient cause for the delay, leading to the dismissal of the four appeals on the grounds of limitation. en-us Mon, 24 Feb 1986 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 May 2011 15:22:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72323 The Tribunal rejected the applications for condonation of delay, holding that the date of service on the Assistant Collector, Coordination Unit, was the effective date of service on the Collector of Customs, Bombay. The appellant failed to prove sufficient cause for the delay, leading to the dismissal of the four appeals on the grounds of limitation. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 24 Feb 1986 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72323